Introduction:
The Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal, which transitioned from a monarchy to a republic in 2008, is witnessing a growing demand from the public for the return of the king's power. This article aims to explore the reasons behind this resurgence of support for reinstating the monarchy in Nepal. While the country has made strides towards democracy, stability, and socio-economic development, the debate surrounding the return of the king highlights the complex sentiments prevailing among the Nepalese citizens.In August 2023, former Nepal Army General Rookmangud Katawal with a large mass following launched a campaign for the restoration of Nepal as a Hindu state. Known as the Hindu Rastra Swabhiman Jagaran Abhiyan, which translates as the Campaign for Dignity and Awareness for a Hindu State, the campaign will focus on “identity and culture” based on religion.
 |
| Nepal |
Katawal said that “the goal of the campaign is to restore Hindu Identity and not establish Hindu fundamentalism.”
Just two weeks earlier, around 20 Hindu religious organizations formed a united front in Devghat in Nepal’s Tanahun district and decided to take to the streets for the restoration of Nepal’s former status as a Hindu state.
It was in 2007 that Nepal was declared a secular state by the interim constitution. However, not everybody in Nepal was happy with this change. Leader among them was the Rashtriya Prajatantra Party-Nepal (RPP-Nepal), a conservative royalist party, which identifies the monarchy and the Hindu state as its primary platform.
 |
| Nepal Map |
The demand for a Hindu nation has gone hand in hand with the demand for the restoration of the monarchy. This is because the monarchy has meshed with Hinduism and the monarch has been regarded as the avatar of the Hindu deity, Vishnu.
To understand the present demand for the return of the king's power, it is crucial to delve into Nepal's history. For over two centuries, Nepal was ruled by successive monarchs, with the Shah dynasty holding sway until the abolition of the monarchy in 2008. During this period, the king enjoyed significant powers and served as a unifying symbol for the diverse ethnic and cultural groups in the country.
Please Also Read:- Why does America always support Israel?
1. Dissatisfaction with Political Instability:
A major factor behind the demand for the return of the king's power in Nepal is the political instability that has persisted since the country's transition to a republic. Frequent changes in government and the inability of political parties to address pressing issues have left the public disillusioned. The monarchy is seen by some as a stabilizing force that could provide a sense of continuity and strong leadership.
2. Lack of Trust in Political Institutions:
Nepal's political landscape has been marred by corruption, poor governance, and the failure to deliver on promises. The public's lack of trust in political institutions has further fueled the call for reinstating the monarchy. Supporters argue that the king, as a non-partisan figure, would be more accountable and less prone to self-serving interests.
A major factor behind the demand for the return of the king's power in Nepal is the political instability that has persisted since the country's transition to a republic. Frequent changes in government and the inability of political parties to address pressing issues have left the public disillusioned. The monarchy is seen by some as a stabilizing force that could provide a sense of continuity and strong leadership.
2. Lack of Trust in Political Institutions:
Nepal's political landscape has been marred by corruption, poor governance, and the failure to deliver on promises. The public's lack of trust in political institutions has further fueled the call for reinstating the monarchy. Supporters argue that the king, as a non-partisan figure, would be more accountable and less prone to self-serving interests.
 |
| Nepal Market |
The monarchy holds a deep cultural and national significance for many Nepalese citizens. Nepal is a country with diverse ethnic groups, languages, and traditions. The monarchy is viewed as a unifying force that transcends these differences and fosters a sense of national identity. Supporters argue that reinstating the king's power would reinforce this collective identity and bring about stability.
4. Economic Development and Prosperity:
Another aspect of the debate revolves around economic development and prosperity. Proponents of the monarchy argue that the king, as a symbol of stability and unity, can attract foreign investment and bolster economic growth. They believe that the monarchy's role in governance would provide a conducive environment for businesses, promote tourism, and attract international cooperation.
5. Dissatisfaction with Current Leadership:
Critics of the current political leadership emphasize their failure to address pressing societal issues such as poverty, corruption, and poor infrastructure. They argue that the return of the king's power would bring renewed focus to these issues and ensure better governance. They believe that the king's influence and intervention would encourage prompt decision-making, resulting in faster development.
Conclusion:
While the demand for the return of the king's power in Nepal has gained momentum, it is vital to acknowledge that this sentiment is not shared by the entire population. The debate surrounding this issue reflects the complex socio-political dynamics of the nation. Ultimately, the decision to reinstate the monarchy or maintain the republic system lies in the hands of the Nepalese people. It is essential for their aspirations, democratic values, and long-term stability to be carefully considered in any future constitutional amendments.
**********************
